Both utility · Kubota against LS Tractor

Kubota M4-071 vs LS MT473CPS

Kubota M4-071

Kubota

Kubota M4-071

~$61,724

72.1 hp engine · 60 PTO−17% to the shaft
LS TractorMT473CPS

LS Tractor

LS MT473CPS

~$61,500

73 hp engine · 62.9 PTO−14% to the shaft

The LS MT473CPS lists about $224 lower; the LS MT473CPS carries 62.9 hp to the PTO against 60; the LS MT473CPS lifts 3,488 lbs on the loader against 2,674; the LS MT473CPS buys more PTO horsepower per dollar, 1.02 per $1,000 against 0.97.

Kubota M4-071 and LS MT473CPS compared row by row. A highlighted cell takes that row on the stated rule: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price.
SpecKubota M4-071LS MT473CPS
Price~$61,724~$61,500
What that price isMSRP, base builddealer list, not MSRP
Size classUtilityUtility
TransmissionPower ShuttlePower Shuttle
Engine hp72.1 hp73 hp
PTO hp60 hp62.9 hp
Loader lift2,674 lbsat the pivot pin3,488 lbsmeasuring point not recorded
Three-point lift3,307 lbs24 in behind the lift points3,483 lbs24 in behind the lift points
Hydraulic flow16.7 GPM21.1 GPM
Drive4WD4WD
EngineKubotaLS
Weight5,952 lbs5,423 lbs
Fuel tank23.8 gal24.3 gal
4WDYesYes
Front loaderYesYes
Cab availableYesYes
HydrostaticNoNo
Power steeringYesYes
Cruise controlNoNo
Warranty3 yr / 3000 hr powertrain6 yr powertrain

A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners of each one say

Kubota M4-071

What they like

  • Undercuts the otherwise identical M4D-071 by $3,888 while giving up only the electro-hydraulic 4WD clutch, a second remote and 540E
  • 3,307 lb of three-point lift measured 24 in behind the lift points is a Category II figure, well beyond anything in the MX range
  • 16.7 gpm to the hitch and telescopic lower links and stabilizers make implement hookup a one-person job
  • 23.8 gal tank supports a full day of mowing or baling without a fuel stop
  • At 5,952 lb it is the lightest of the three M4s, which helps on soft ground
  • Air-conditioned Ultra Grand Cab II is standard, not an upcharge

What they complain about

  • Mechanical rather than electro-hydraulic on-the-go 4WD, so engaging and disengaging takes a lever and a pause
  • One standard remote valve against two on both M4D models, and 540E is an option rather than standard
  • Cab only - there is no ROPS build to cut the price or the height
  • The LA1154 lifts 2,674 lb at the pivot pin at full height, which is modest next to the 3,307 lb the rear hitch will pick up
  • No creeper unless the optional F18/R18 box is ordered

LS MT473CPS

What they like

  • The power shuttle reverses without the clutch, which is the single feature that makes a day of loader work tolerable and which the base MT473 does not have
  • 62.9 hp at the PTO from 73 gross is only a 14 percent driveline loss, so a 7 ft cutter or a small round baler is well within reach
  • 3,483 lb of Category II lift is quoted 24 in behind the hitch end rather than at the ball ends, so it is the conservative number and understates the machine against rivals that publish the flattering one
  • 24.3 gal of fuel and 21.1 GPM of total flow are both genuine utility-class figures, not compact-class ones stretched
  • Costs roughly what a mid-spec 60 hp cab tractor does from the established brands, which is the entire reason to look at LS at this size

What they complain about

  • The 5,423 lb weight LS publishes is the bare figure, and the cab build this price describes is heavier - LS does not publish a separate cab weight
  • The 3,488 lb LL5001 loader is carried over unchanged from the 63 hp MT463, so none of the extra ten horsepower reaches the front end
  • LS publishes no price whatever, so the figure here is two dealer lists agreeing rather than a maker sheet
  • No measuring point is stated for the loader rating even though LS does state one for the 3-point
  • There is no hydrostatic option anywhere in the MT4 series
  • Parts and warranty support depend on a dealer network far thinner than Deere's or Kubota's, which is a real risk on a machine this expensive