LS MT225S vs Massey Ferguson 1825E
Quick take: The LS MT225S has more engine power (24.7 vs 24 hp); the Massey Ferguson 1825E has more loader lift (1,437 vs 1,067 lbs).
| Spec | LS MT225S | Massey Ferguson 1825E |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $18,500 | $18,500 |
| Rating | 4.3★ (380) | 4.4★ (190) |
| Category | Compact | Compact |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Engine HP | 24.7 hp | 24 hp |
| PTO HP | 19.3 hp | 19.2 hp |
| Loader Lift | 1067 lbs | 1437 lbs |
| 3-Point Lift | 1896 lbs | 1598 lbs |
| Hydraulic Flow | 9.3 GPM | 10.9 GPM |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Engine | Yanmar | Iseki |
| Weight | 2094 lbs | 2668 lbs |
| Fuel Tank | 8.7 gal | 10 gal |
| 4WD | Yes | Yes |
| Loader | Yes | Yes |
| Cab | No | No |
| Hydrostatic | Yes | Yes |
| Power steering | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | No | No |
| Warranty | 6 yr powertrain | 6 yr powertrain |
Pros & cons
LS MT225S
- ✓It's powered by a proven Yanmar diesel, so the core engine has an excellent reliability reputation despite the value price
- ✓The 1,896 lb 3-point lift is remarkably strong for the price, beating a Kubota L2501 and Deere 3025E
- ✓LS builds the New Holland Workmaster tractors too, so the engineering is proven and mainstream, not fly-by-night
- ✓It's one of the lowest-priced legitimate compact tractors with a loader you can buy new
- ✓Comes loaded with standard features - telescoping stabilizers, quick-attach loader, and 9.3 GPM hydraulics
- ✓The 6-year powertrain warranty gives budget buyers solid peace of mind
- ✓Owners praise the value proposition, saying it does the same work as a Kubota for thousands less
- ✓The Yanmar engine and stout build make it a genuinely capable little workhorse
- ✗The LS dealer network is the thinnest of the major value brands, so service and parts can be a real challenge in many regions
- ✗Resale value is the weakest in this group - LS depreciates hard because brand recognition is low
- ✗Fit and finish trails Kubota and Deere, with cheaper plastics and switchgear noted by owners
- ✗Only 19.3 PTO HP, so it's modest on wider PTO implements
- ✗Brand awareness is low, so some buyers worry about long-term support even though the tractors are solid
- ✗The loader lift of 1,067 lbs is lower than the impressive 3-point figure, creating a capability mismatch
- ✗The owner community is small, so online troubleshooting help is limited
- ✗Some owners report longer waits for parts than they'd get from Kubota or Deere
Massey Ferguson 1825E
- ✓You get a genuine compact-frame tractor (2,668 lbs, bigger tires, more clearance) for roughly what a loaded Kubota BX sub-compact costs
- ✓The Iseki-built 1.5L diesel is a proven, quiet powerplant - Iseki has supplied engines to multiple compact tractor brands for decades
- ✓1,598 lb three-point lift at 24 inches doubles what a BX or Deere 1025R can pick up, so box blades and tillers that stall sub-compacts are no problem
- ✓10-gallon fuel tank is nearly double a sub-compact's, so you work all day without refueling
- ✓Higher ground clearance and larger rear tires handle rough pasture and rutted trails that beach a BX-class machine
- ✓Simple economy spec means less to break - owners like that there's no fragile trim or extra electronics
- ✓Massey's 6-year powertrain warranty on compacts matches Kubota and nearly matches Deere
- ✓The FLx2407 loader lifts 1,437 lbs, real loader capability for firewood, gravel, and pallet work
- ✗It's an economy model and feels like it - flat sheet-metal fenders, basic seat, and none of the refinement of a Kubota B or Deere 2-series
- ✗No cruise control and few comfort amenities, which matters on long mowing days
- ✗The E-series parts-bin ergonomics draw complaints - control placement is functional but awkward compared to Kubota's layout
- ✗AGCO/Massey compact dealers are sparser than Kubota and Deere in much of the US, so check local support first
- ✗Resale value is soft - Masseys in this class sell used at bigger discounts than the equivalent orange or green tractor
- ✗No mid-PTO on the base configuration means belly mower options are limited versus a 1025R or BX
- ✗24 engine HP is modest for a 2,700 lb tractor - it works, but it's leisurely with heavy loads compared to a 25+ HP Kubota L
- ✗Fit and finish nitpicks (paint, plastic quality) show where the cost savings came from

