More than any other tractor here, the MT225S is bought as a package on a long zero-percent loan. The deals owners report are remarkably consistent: around $34,000 to $36,000 out the door for the tractor, loader, third-function controls, a rake grapple, a 48-inch rotary cutter, a 48-inch tiller, a box blade and a twenty-foot trailer, financed at 0% over 120 months with nothing down — one owner works out to about $296 a month for all of it. The tractor and loader alone run about $19,000, and one buyer paid $27,000 with a loader and belly mower and blamed tariffs. Owners also note that taking the finance gives up the cash rebate, which cost one of them roughly $3,000, and they generally decide the maths still favours the loan. The other thing worth knowing is what it is: LS builds the New Holland Workmaster compacts, and owners say the Workmaster 25 is literally the same machine.
In use, the machine most owners are replacing is a shed full of old equipment — a 1970s Ford 2000, a lawn tractor, a snowblower and a rear-tine tiller all retired by one purchase. At 24.9 hp there is no particulate filter and no regeneration cycle, which owners mention as a relief rather than a feature. The 5-foot belly mower earns specific praise for being genuinely heavy, with a deck around an eighth of an inch thick and quarter-inch blades that chew woody stalks at zero-turn speeds. The two warnings in the file are worth taking seriously. Someone who repairs these says the MT225S uses a cast aluminium transmission housing, where the more basic 225E uses cast steel, and that he has repaired more than a few cracked housings on this model. And one buyer was still waiting five weeks after signing for a mower deck his dealer said was on the way, which is the parts-supply worry made concrete.
Is the New Holland Workmaster 25S the same tractor?+−
Owners say it is — LS builds New Holland's Workmaster compacts, and one describes the two as literally the same machine. That is worth knowing in both directions: it means the LS is not an unknown-quantity import, and it means you can price the identical tractor through two dealer networks and take whichever gives you the better deal and the better service department.
How much rear ballast does an MT225S want?+−
More than filled tires alone. One owner running a grapple for logs and brush uses filled rear tires plus a dual-bracket hitch weight carrier loaded with eight 70 lb weights and eight 42 lb weights, and calls that about right for all his loader work. He is doing the job most owners buy the tractor for, so treat that as the realistic setup rather than an extreme one.
Forks or a grapple?+−
One owner deliberately skipped forks and bought a rake grapple instead, on the grounds that forks are close to useless for the work he actually does — picking up brush and logs — because nothing on them is secured. If you are moving pallets of material that is a different calculation, but for clearing land the grapple is what owners reach for, and it needs third-function plumbing ordered with the tractor.
Is the loader lift figure realistic?+−
Only at the pin. Owners pass on the same rule of thumb: published loader capacity is measured at the pins where the loader mounts to the tractor, and you should expect roughly 35% less at the quick-attach plate, with more lost the further the load sits forward. One owner's comparison is sobering — his old skid steer of similar weight and less power out-lifted the tractor simply because of where its counterweight sits relative to the attachment.
Is the thin dealer network a real problem?+−
It depends entirely on where you are, and the evidence points both ways. One owner has seven LS dealers between home and his hunting property and treats coverage as a non-issue. Another has been waiting five weeks for a mower deck his dealer promised on delivery and is now worried about what a real breakdown would mean. The practical advice owners give applies to any of the value brands: buy from the dealer whose parts counter you have actually stood at.
Summarised from public owner discussion, not from testing. Nothing here was measured by this site, and a report that recurs is not the same as a defect rate.