Both compact · John Deere against Yanmar
John Deere 2025R vs Yanmar YM225
| Spec | John Deere 2025R | Yanmar YM225 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$21,768 | ~$22,199 |
| What that price is | MSRP, base build | dealer list, not MSRP |
| Size class | Compact | Compact |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Shuttle |
| Engine hp | 24.2 hp | 24.4 hp |
| PTO hp | 18 hp | 18.5 hp |
| Loader lift | 1,023 lbsat the pivot pin | 1,500 lbsat the pivot pin |
| Three-point lift | 1,150 lbs24 in behind the lift points | 2,205 lbsat the ball ends |
| Hydraulic flow | 6.4 GPM | 10.0 GPM |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Engine | Yanmar | Yanmar |
| Weight | 1,755 lbs | 2,800 lbs |
| Fuel tank | 5.4 gal | 10.5 gal |
| 4WD | Yes | Yes |
| Front loader | Yes | Yes |
| Cab available | No | No |
| Hydrostatic | Yes | No |
| Power steering | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | Yes | No |
| Warranty | 6 yr / 2000 hr powertrain | 10 yr / 3000 hr powertrain |
A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.
From owner discussion and long-term write-ups
What owners of each one say
John Deere 2025R
What they like
- Much stronger 1,150 lb 3-point lift than the 1025R, so it handles heavier rear implements like box blades and rotary cutters far better
- The 220R loader lifts over 1,000 lbs, a meaningful upgrade over the 1025R for material handling
- Keeps the beloved AutoConnect drive-over mower deck, so you still mount the deck without leaving the seat
- The longer wheelbase and extra weight give it a more planted, stable feel than the 1025R for loader and slope work
- Cruise control standard on the HST makes long mowing sessions much easier on the operator
- It's a genuine step up in capability while still fitting in a standard garage and trailer easily
What they complain about
- It costs noticeably more than a 1025R for only a modest bump in engine HP, so many owners debate whether it's worth the jump
- Still only 24.2 engine HP and 18 PTO HP, so the power is unchanged from the 1025R - you're paying mostly for lift and size
- The tiny 5.4-gallon fuel tank carries over, meaning frequent refueling on big jobs
- Deere's proprietary loader and deck lock you out of cheaper third-party attachments
- Fully equipped it pushes past $22K, encroaching on 3025E territory which has more real power
- Ground clearance is still fairly low for rough terrain compared to a 3-series
- The premium Deere pricing means a comparably capable Kubota LX or Kioti CK often costs less
Yanmar YM225
What they like
- 1,500 lb loader lift at the pivot pin clears the sub-compact SA425 by 300 lb for roughly $800 more on the sticker
- 24.4 hp keeps it a whisker under the 25 hp line, so no diesel particulate filter and no regeneration cycles
- 10.5-gallon tank is nearly double the SA series' 6.1 gallons, which is the difference between a full working day and a fuel stop
- Column-mounted synchronized reverser puts direction changes at hand height rather than on a floor lever, which counts on repetitive loader cycles
- 2,205 lb 3-point capacity at the ball ends is well ahead of what 24 hp would suggest, so Category 1 implements are not the limiting factor
- 10-year / 3,000-hour powertrain warranty carries across the whole Yanmar line, including this entry model
What they complain about
- No hydrostatic option anywhere on the YM2 platform, so fine inching in tight spaces is harder than on an SA425 or a Kubota BX
- 18.5 PTO hp from 24.4 gross is about a 24% drivetrain loss, leaving thin headroom for a 60-inch rotary cutter in heavy grass
- The PTO is transmission-driven through an overrunning clutch rather than independent, so declutching stops the implement
- Yanmar lists no cab for the YM2 series - a canopy kit is the extent of the weather protection
- 2,800 lb bare weight is light against 1,500 lb of loader lift, making rear ballast effectively compulsory rather than optional

