Both compact · John Deere against Yanmar
John Deere 3025E vs Yanmar YM225
| Spec | John Deere 3025E | Yanmar YM225 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$22,790 | ~$22,199 |
| What that price is | MSRP, base build | dealer list, not MSRP |
| Size class | Compact | Compact |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Shuttle |
| Engine hp | 24.4 hp | 24.4 hp |
| PTO hp | 18.5 hp | 18.5 hp |
| Loader lift | 1,186 lbsat the pivot pin | 1,500 lbsat the pivot pin |
| Three-point lift | 1,356 lbs24 in behind the lift points | 2,205 lbsat the ball ends |
| Hydraulic flow | 7.9 GPM | 10.0 GPM |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Engine | Yanmar | Yanmar |
| Weight | 2,354 lbs | 2,800 lbs |
| Fuel tank | 8.2 gal | 10.5 gal |
| 4WD | Yes | Yes |
| Front loader | Yes | Yes |
| Cab available | No | No |
| Hydrostatic | Yes | No |
| Power steering | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | No | No |
| Warranty | 6 yr / 2000 hr powertrain | 10 yr / 3000 hr powertrain |
A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.
From owner discussion and long-term write-ups
What owners of each one say
John Deere 3025E
What they like
- You get a full-size 3-series frame, axles, and lift capacity at a price barely above the sub-compact 2025R - it's the value sweet spot in the Deere lineup
- The 1,356 lb 3-point lift and 300E loader make it far more capable with real implements than any sub-compact
- The bigger frame and heavier weight make it stable and confident on slopes and with a loaded bucket
- Yanmar diesel power with Deere's massive dealer network and outstanding resale value
- Standard Category 1 3-point hitch and larger PTO make it compatible with a huge range of full-size implements
- The larger 8.2-gallon fuel tank means far fewer refuels than the 1 and 2 series
What they complain about
- It's the stripped-down E model, so it lacks the deluxe features, hydraulic outlets, and refinement of the pricier 3R models
- Only 24.4 HP - the same power band as a sub-compact - so it's not fast and can bog in heavy tillage or a big rotary cutter
- No mid-PTO or drive-over mower deck option, so it's not the tractor for finish mowing large lawns
- You pay a Deere premium versus a comparably specced Kubota L2501 or Kioti CK, which often cost less
- Some owners wish they'd stepped up to the 3038E for the extra 13 HP that costs relatively little more
- Base tires and lack of a loader self-leveling feature are common upgrade complaints
Yanmar YM225
What they like
- 1,500 lb loader lift at the pivot pin clears the sub-compact SA425 by 300 lb for roughly $800 more on the sticker
- 24.4 hp keeps it a whisker under the 25 hp line, so no diesel particulate filter and no regeneration cycles
- 10.5-gallon tank is nearly double the SA series' 6.1 gallons, which is the difference between a full working day and a fuel stop
- Column-mounted synchronized reverser puts direction changes at hand height rather than on a floor lever, which counts on repetitive loader cycles
- 2,205 lb 3-point capacity at the ball ends is well ahead of what 24 hp would suggest, so Category 1 implements are not the limiting factor
- 10-year / 3,000-hour powertrain warranty carries across the whole Yanmar line, including this entry model
What they complain about
- No hydrostatic option anywhere on the YM2 platform, so fine inching in tight spaces is harder than on an SA425 or a Kubota BX
- 18.5 PTO hp from 24.4 gross is about a 24% drivetrain loss, leaving thin headroom for a 60-inch rotary cutter in heavy grass
- The PTO is transmission-driven through an overrunning clutch rather than independent, so declutching stops the implement
- Yanmar lists no cab for the YM2 series - a canopy kit is the extent of the weather protection
- 2,800 lb bare weight is light against 1,500 lb of loader lift, making rear ballast effectively compulsory rather than optional

