Compact against Utility · same John Deere lineup

John Deere 3033R vs John Deere 5067E

John Deere 3033R

John Deere

John Deere 3033R

~$32,719

31.8 hp engine · 23 PTO−28% to the shaft
John Deere 5067E

John Deere

John Deere 5067E

~$34,887

67.6 hp engine · 49 PTO−28% to the shaft

The John Deere 3033R lists about $2,168 lower; the John Deere 5067E carries 49 hp to the PTO against 23; the John Deere 5067E lifts 2,606 lbs on the loader against 1,393; the John Deere 5067E buys more PTO horsepower per dollar, 1.4 per $1,000 against 0.7.

John Deere 3033R and John Deere 5067E compared row by row. A highlighted cell takes that row on the stated rule: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price.
SpecJohn Deere 3033RJohn Deere 5067E
Price~$32,719~$34,887
What that price isMSRP, base buildMSRP for 2WD open station; Deere lists MFWD separately at $7,103
Size classCompactUtility
TransmissionHydrostaticShuttle
Engine hp31.8 hp67.6 hp
PTO hp23 hp49 hp
Loader lift1,393 lbsat the pivot pin2,606 lbsat the pivot pin
Three-point lift2,194 lbs24 in behind the lift points3,192 lbs24 in behind the lift points
Hydraulic flow15.3 GPM18.2 GPM
Drive4WD4WD
EngineYanmarJohn Deere
Weight2,983 lbs6,029 lbs
Fuel tank10 gal19 gal
4WDYesYes
Front loaderYesYes
Cab availableYesYes
HydrostaticYesNo
Power steeringYesYes
Cruise controlYesNo
Warranty6 yr / 2000 hr powertrain5 yr / 2000 hr powertrain

A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners of each one say

John Deere 3033R

What they like

  • 15.3 gpm total pump flow with 9.1 gpm to implements is two-thirds more than the 3E line manages, which is what makes a backhoe and loader usable on the same machine
  • 2,194 lb at 24 in. behind the lift points, against 1,356 lb on a 3038E costing barely less
  • A factory ComfortGard cab with climate control can be ordered, and nothing in the 3E or 3D lines can
  • The 320R loader lifts 1,393 lb at the pivot pin against the 300E's 1,186 lb, a real step up in the hardware that does the work
  • Cruise control is standard with eHydro, and a 12F/12R PowrReverser gearbox is available instead if you want gears
  • 10 gal of fuel on the open-station build, rising to 12.6 gal with the cab

What they complain about

  • 23 PTO hp with eHydro is the weakest link in the machine - a 3038E costing less puts 30 hp to the PTO
  • It is the only 3R with no turbocharger, so 31.8 hp comes from a naturally aspirated 1.642 L and there is no headroom under load
  • The cab is offered only with eHydro, so the PowrReverser and cab cannot be combined
  • 1,005 lb at 500 mm ahead of the pivot pin is the figure that governs pallet forks, well below the 1,393 lb pin rating that gets quoted
  • Final Tier 4 here means a diesel particulate filter and regeneration cycles

John Deere 5067E

What they like

  • 49 PTO hp is enough for a small round baler, which is the job that pushes buyers out of the compact range in the first place
  • Final Tier 4 with no diesel particulate filter anywhere in the 5E line, so no regeneration cycles and one less service item
  • Deere's own PowerTech 3029 EWR rather than a bought-in engine, with parts through the same dealer network
  • Cab, 12F/12R PowrReverser and eHydro are all available; the eHydro build also raises pump flow to 29.6 gpm
  • 6,029 lb in 4WD open-station trim gives it the weight to hold a Category 2 implement
  • About $2,600 below a 5075E on Deere's published list for the same hitch, hydraulics and cab options

What they complain about

  • Deere's published figure is a 2WD open-station machine; MFWD adds $7,103 and a cab about $10,200 on the same price page
  • The base 9F/3R SyncShuttle has no power shuttle, so every direction change on loader work goes through the clutch
  • 49 PTO hp from 67.6 gross means about 28 percent lost before the shaft
  • 18.2 gpm is the same flow the 50 hp 5050E gets, so implements do not run any faster for the extra engine
  • No cruise control on any SyncShuttle build