Both compact · same LS Tractor lineup

LS MT335H vs LS MT340HC

LS TractorMT335H

LS Tractor

LS MT335H

Ask a dealer

35 hp engine · 28 PTO−20% to the shaft
LS TractorMT340HC

LS Tractor

LS MT340HC

Ask a dealer

40 hp engine · 32 PTO−20% to the shaft

The LS MT340HC carries 32 hp to the PTO against 28.

LS MT335H and LS MT340HC compared row by row. A highlighted cell takes that row on the stated rule: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price.
SpecLS MT335HLS MT340HC
Pricenot publishednot published
What that price isno published priceno published price
Size classCompactCompact
TransmissionHydrostaticHydrostatic
Engine hp35 hp40 hp
PTO hp28 hp32 hp
Loader lift2,185 lbsmeasuring point not recorded2,185 lbsmeasuring point not recorded
Three-point lift1,808 lbsat the ball ends1,808 lbsat the ball ends
Hydraulic flow13.7 GPM13.7 GPM
Drive4WD4WD
EngineLSLS
Weight3,285 lbs3,661 lbs
Fuel tank10.6 gal12.4 gal
4WDYesYes
Front loaderYesYes
Cab availableNoYes
HydrostaticYesYes
Power steeringYesYes
Cruise controlNoNo
Warranty6 yr powertrain6 yr powertrain

A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners of each one say

LS MT335H

What they like

  • 2,185 lb of loader lift from a 3,285 lb tractor is a high ratio for 35 hp, and the LL3116 is the same loader the 40 hp MT340HC carries
  • LS builds the L3C19-T turbocharged common-rail engine itself, so the driveline is single-source from engine to rear axle
  • 13.7 GPM of total flow on the hydrostatic with 8.2 GPM reserved for implements - more flow than the MT2 series gets
  • The lightest machine on the MT3 frame at 3,285 lb, which makes it the MT3 least likely to mark turf
  • Six-year powertrain cover with no deductible, twice the usual term at this size
  • 28.0 hp reaches the PTO out of 35 at the engine, so a five-foot cutter is well within it

What they complain about

  • LS publishes no prices at all, and no dealer consulted lists this model with a figure - the two dealers that print bare LS prices do not stock it and one dealer model-list shows it as 'Get Price'
  • ROPS only; there is no cab build of the MT335H, so the cab buyer has to step up to the MT340HC
  • 1,808 lb at the hitch is a Category 1 figure shared with the whole MT2 range, so the rear end does not match the strong loader
  • LS does not state where it measures loader lift capacity, so the 2,185 lb figure cannot be compared with a Kubota or Deere pin rating
  • 10.6 gal of fuel is modest for a turbocharged 35 hp machine doing loader work
  • No cruise control is listed, which tells on long hydrostatic mowing runs

LS MT340HC

What they like

  • A sealed cab at 40 hp is the cheapest entry to one in the LS range, and several rivals offer no cab at all below 45 hp
  • 12.4 gal of fuel against the MT335H's 10.6, which matters because a cab tractor gets used in weather that keeps the work going
  • 32.0 hp at the PTO, enough for a six-foot rear blower or cutter, with 13.7 GPM of total flow behind the loader
  • LL3116 loader rated 2,185 lb, unchanged from the lighter ROPS model, so the cab costs nothing in lifting
  • Six-year powertrain warranty with no deductible
  • LS's own L3C19-T common-rail three-cylinder, the same engine as the rest of the MT3 frame

What they complain about

  • No published price from LS or any dealer - one dealer model-list shows the MT340HC as 'Get Price', and neither of the two dealers that print bare LS prices stocks it
  • There is no ROPS version, so the cab cannot be declined to save money
  • 1,808 lb at the hitch is a Category 1 rating shared with the 24 hp MT226, which is the weak point of this machine
  • 3,661 lb with the cab on a compact chassis is heavy for turf, and 376 lb more than the MT335H
  • LS states no measuring point for the 2,185 lb loader figure, so it is not comparable with rival pin ratings
  • No cruise control listed, on a hydrostatic cab tractor where it would be most useful