Utility against Compact · same Massey Ferguson lineup
Massey Ferguson 2606H vs Massey Ferguson 1M.40
Massey Ferguson2606H
Massey Ferguson
Massey Ferguson 2606H
~$33,793
65 hp engine · 55 PTO−15% to the shaft
Massey Ferguson1M.40
Massey Ferguson
Massey Ferguson 1M.40
~$29,466
39.4 hp engine · 30 PTO−24% to the shaft
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Massey Ferguson 1M.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$33,793 | ~$29,466 |
| What that price is | MSRP, base build | MSRP, base build |
| Size class | Utility | Compact |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Power Shuttle |
| Engine hp | 65 hp | 39.4 hp |
| PTO hp | 55 hp | 30 hp |
| Loader lift | 2,470 lbsat the pivot pin | 1,870 lbs500 mm ahead of the pin |
| Three-point lift | 2,755 lbs24 in behind the lift points | 2,535 lbs24 in behind the lift points |
| Hydraulic flow | 10.6 GPM | 12.6 GPM |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Engine | Simpson | Iseki |
| Weight | 5,710 lbs | 3,428 lbs |
| Fuel tank | not published | not published |
| 4WD | Yes | Yes |
| Front loader | Yes | Yes |
| Cab available | No | Yes |
| Hydrostatic | No | No |
| Power steering | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | No | No |
| Warranty | 6 yr / 2000 hr powertrain | 5 yr powertrain |
A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.
From owner discussion and long-term write-ups
What owners of each one say
Massey Ferguson 2606H
What they like
- The 8x8 synchro shuttle is the standard transmission here, not an option, so direction changes do not mean the clutch the way they do on the 2604H
- 55 hp at the PTO from 65 at the engine, an 85 percent take-off that will run a seven-foot cutter or a small baler
- 5,710 lb in 4WD form, over 800 lb heavier than the 2605H, which is what turns engine power into drawbar pull
- Turbocharged intercooled 2.6 L Simpson meeting Tier 4 Final without a DPF interval to plan around
- Available in 2WD at 5,115 lb for flat-ground work
- Same 15.7 gpm hydraulic system as the smaller models, so nothing was cut back to hit the price
What they complain about
- The 4WD build is $4,826 over the 2WD one in AGCO's price book and the MF911X loader a further $8,668, so a loader-equipped 2606H lands a long way above its base figure
- The MF911X loader rates 2,470 lb at the pivot pins and 1,500 lb at 31.5 inches forward - less than the 2,755 lb the three-point hitch lifts behind, so the rear linkage is the stronger end of this tractor
- 2,755 lb at the hitch is unchanged from the 55 hp model below it, so 10 extra horsepower buys no extra lift
- No fuel tank capacity is published for the series
- Folding ROPS only, no cab anywhere in the 2600 H range, which is a hard sell at 65 hp against a New Holland Workmaster 65
- 10.6 gpm to implements is the same as the 45 hp 2604H, so hydraulic capacity does not scale with the engine
- The 2,470 lb loader figure is the MF911X, the 4WD 2600H loader, which is why the 2WD-only 2605H out-lifts this model on paper despite having 10 fewer horsepower
Massey Ferguson 1M.40
What they like
- 30.0 hp at the PTO on the 12-speed power shuttle, enough for a six-foot rotary cutter that the 1M.35 has to be worked harder to turn
- Same 3,428 lb weight as the 1M.35 for 3.2 more engine horsepower, so the extra output is not paid for in ground pressure
- 12.6 gpm pump plus 7 gpm dedicated to steering, so loader cycle times hold up under a full bucket
- 1,870 lb loader capacity rated 19.5 inches forward of the pivot pin, which is the conservative point rather than the flattering one
- Folding ROPS standard with an air-conditioned cab optional at 3,858 lb
- The 1.8 L Iseki three-cylinder runs without a turbo, so there is one fewer wear item than on rivals that turbocharge to reach 40 hp
What they complain about
- A cab takes this to $38,399 and the Deluxe Cab to $42,135, so the operator station alone can cost more than a whole 1GC sub-compact
- Every capacity figure is identical to the cheaper 1M.35, so the whole case for the 1M.40 is 3.2 engine horsepower
- No fuel tank capacity is published by Massey or by the specification databases
- 30.0 hp at the PTO from 39.4 at the engine, dropping to 27.9 on the hydrostatic - about a quarter lost either way
- Massey names no loader model and publishes no hydraulic or warranty detail on the M Series page itself