Utility against Compact · same Massey Ferguson lineup

Massey Ferguson 2606H vs Massey Ferguson 2M.50

Massey Ferguson2606H

Massey Ferguson

Massey Ferguson 2606H

~$33,793

65 hp engine · 55 PTO−15% to the shaft
Massey Ferguson2M.50

Massey Ferguson

Massey Ferguson 2M.50

~$35,771

48.8 hp engine · 38.1 PTO−22% to the shaft

The Massey Ferguson 2606H lists about $1,978 lower; the Massey Ferguson 2606H carries 55 hp to the PTO against 38.1; the Massey Ferguson 2606H lifts 2,470 lbs on the loader against 1,880; the Massey Ferguson 2606H buys more PTO horsepower per dollar, 1.63 per $1,000 against 1.07.

Massey Ferguson 2606H and Massey Ferguson 2M.50 compared row by row. A highlighted cell takes that row on the stated rule: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price.
SpecMassey Ferguson 2606HMassey Ferguson 2M.50
Price~$33,793~$35,771
What that price isMSRP, base buildMSRP, base build
Size classUtilityCompact
TransmissionShuttlePower Shuttle
Engine hp65 hp48.8 hp
PTO hp55 hp38.1 hp
Loader lift2,470 lbsat the pivot pin1,880 lbs500 mm ahead of the pin
Three-point lift2,755 lbs24 in behind the lift points3,307 lbs24 in behind the lift points
Hydraulic flow10.6 GPM12.7 GPM
Drive4WD4WD
EngineSimpsonIseki
Weight5,710 lbs4,035 lbs
Fuel tanknot publishednot published
4WDYesYes
Front loaderYesYes
Cab availableNoYes
HydrostaticNoNo
Power steeringYesYes
Cruise controlNoNo
Warranty6 yr / 2000 hr powertrain5 yr powertrain

A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners of each one say

Massey Ferguson 2606H

What they like

  • The 8x8 synchro shuttle is the standard transmission here, not an option, so direction changes do not mean the clutch the way they do on the 2604H
  • 55 hp at the PTO from 65 at the engine, an 85 percent take-off that will run a seven-foot cutter or a small baler
  • 5,710 lb in 4WD form, over 800 lb heavier than the 2605H, which is what turns engine power into drawbar pull
  • Turbocharged intercooled 2.6 L Simpson meeting Tier 4 Final without a DPF interval to plan around
  • Available in 2WD at 5,115 lb for flat-ground work
  • Same 15.7 gpm hydraulic system as the smaller models, so nothing was cut back to hit the price

What they complain about

  • The 4WD build is $4,826 over the 2WD one in AGCO's price book and the MF911X loader a further $8,668, so a loader-equipped 2606H lands a long way above its base figure
  • The MF911X loader rates 2,470 lb at the pivot pins and 1,500 lb at 31.5 inches forward - less than the 2,755 lb the three-point hitch lifts behind, so the rear linkage is the stronger end of this tractor
  • 2,755 lb at the hitch is unchanged from the 55 hp model below it, so 10 extra horsepower buys no extra lift
  • No fuel tank capacity is published for the series
  • Folding ROPS only, no cab anywhere in the 2600 H range, which is a hard sell at 65 hp against a New Holland Workmaster 65
  • 10.6 gpm to implements is the same as the 45 hp 2604H, so hydraulic capacity does not scale with the engine
  • The 2,470 lb loader figure is the MF911X, the 4WD 2600H loader, which is why the 2WD-only 2605H out-lifts this model on paper despite having 10 fewer horsepower

Massey Ferguson 2M.50

What they like

  • 3,307 lb of lift 24 inches behind the ball ends, up 30 percent on the 1M.40 and enough for a heavy rear blade or a three-point spreader
  • A four-cylinder 2.4 L Iseki rather than the three-cylinder in the 1M frame, so torque delivery is smoother under a cutter
  • 38.1 hp at the PTO on the 12-speed power shuttle, which is more than the whole engine output of the 1GC range it sits above
  • The power shuttle version lifts 3,307 lb where the hydrostatic manages 3,086, and Massey publishes both rather than quoting the better one
  • Air-conditioned cab optional at 4,398 lb, with Classic and Deluxe cab trims offered
  • At 4,035 lb in ROPS form it is heavy enough to hold a loaded bucket down without ballast that a lighter compact would need

What they complain about

  • The cab build is $8,726 more at $44,497 and the Deluxe Cab $48,212 - well past what the 65 hp 2606H utility tractor costs
  • 1,880 lb at the loader is only 10 lb more than the 1M.40 below it, so the front end does not scale with the engine or the hitch
  • No fuel tank capacity is published anywhere for the 2M range
  • Choosing the hydrostatic costs both lift capacity, down to 3,086 lb, and 1.9 PTO horsepower
  • Massey names no loader model and publishes no warranty term on the M Series page
Massey Ferguson 2606H spec sheetMassey Ferguson 2M.50 spec sheet