Utility against Compact · same Massey Ferguson lineup
Massey Ferguson 2607H vs Massey Ferguson 2M.60
Massey Ferguson2607H
Massey Ferguson
Massey Ferguson 2607H
~$36,667
74 hp engine · 64 PTO−14% to the shaft
Massey Ferguson2M.60
Massey Ferguson
Massey Ferguson 2M.60
~$40,358
60.3 hp engine · 47 PTO−22% to the shaft
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Massey Ferguson 2M.60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$36,667 | ~$40,358 |
| What that price is | MSRP, base build | MSRP, base build |
| Size class | Utility | Compact |
| Transmission | Gear | Power Shuttle |
| Engine hp | 74 hp | 60.3 hp |
| PTO hp | 64 hp | 47 hp |
| Loader lift | 2,470 lbsat the pivot pin | 1,880 lbs500 mm ahead of the pin |
| Three-point lift | 2,755 lbs24 in behind the lift points | 3,307 lbs24 in behind the lift points |
| Hydraulic flow | 10.6 GPM | 12.7 GPM |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Engine | Simpson | Iseki |
| Weight | 5,864 lbs | 4,255 lbs |
| Fuel tank | 21.9 gal | not published |
| 4WD | Yes | Yes |
| Front loader | Yes | Yes |
| Cab available | No | Yes |
| Hydrostatic | No | No |
| Power steering | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | No | No |
| Warranty | 6 yr / 2000 hr powertrain | 5 yr powertrain |
A highlighted cell wins its row on the rule named above the table: more power, lift, capacity or flow, or a lower price. A lift row is left unwon whenever the two makers measured in different places, or where either of them did not say — a figure quoted at the pivot pin and one quoted 500 mm ahead of it describe the same loader and differ by roughly a third, so ranking them against each other would invent a result. Prices are typical list and move with dealer packages.
From owner discussion and long-term write-ups
What owners of each one say
Massey Ferguson 2607H
What they like
- The turbocharged Simpson diesel meets Tier 4 without a DPF, so owners avoid regen cycles and enjoy simpler maintenance
- At 64 PTO HP it has excellent PTO output for the class, running big balers, mowers, and tillage tools with authority
- The 8x8 synchro-shuttle transmission is a rugged, straightforward drivetrain for sustained field work
- It's priced well below a comparable Deere 5075E or Kubota M-series while delivering similar power
- The stout 5,200 lb frame and strong hitch make it a genuine full-size working tractor
- The large 22-gallon tank keeps it working through long days in the field
What they complain about
- The Simpson engine is less familiar to US buyers than a Deere, Kubota, or FPT powerplant, hurting resale confidence
- Massey's utility-tractor dealer network is thinner than Deere's and Kubota's in much of the US
- The 10.6 GPM hydraulic flow is modest for a 74 HP tractor, so loader cycles feel slow to some owners
- No hydrostatic or power-shuttle option, so direction changes require the clutch, less convenient for loader work
- Resale value trails the premium Japanese and green brands
- The open-station-only configuration limits all-weather comfort without a cab
- At over 5,200 lbs plus loader it needs a heavy-duty truck and trailer to transport
- Massey publishes no loader lift capacity for the 2600 H series, so this entry carries none — a loader is available from the dealer, but the figure that would let you compare it against a Kubota or a Deere is not published anywhere
- The 2,470 lb loader figure is the MF911X, the 4WD 2600H loader; the 2WD-only 2605H takes the larger FLx2815, so the lineup's biggest engine does not carry its biggest loader
Massey Ferguson 2M.60
What they like
- 47.0 hp at the PTO on the power shuttle, which will turn a seven-foot cutter or drive a small round baler
- Gets to 60.3 hp from 2.4 litres without a turbocharger, so there is no boost system to service
- 3,307 lb hitch capacity at the conservative 24-inch measuring point, matching the 2M.50 rather than being cut back for the bigger engine
- Only 220 lb heavier than the 2M.50 for 11.5 more horsepower
- Air-conditioned cab optional at 4,641 lb, in Classic or Deluxe trim
- Massey publishes separate lift and PTO ratings for the shuttle and the hydrostatic instead of quoting one figure for both
What they complain about
- There is no hydrostatic platform 2M.60 in AGCO's price book at all: the hydrostatic comes only as a cab tractor at $48,659, so wanting hydro here costs $8,301 more than this power shuttle
- 1,880 lb at the loader is the same as the 48.8 hp 2M.50 and barely more than the 39.4 hp 1M.40, so the front end is the weak point of the range
- No fuel tank capacity published, which matters more at 60 hp than anywhere else in the lineup
- The hydrostatic option drops the PTO to 44.6 hp and the hitch to 3,086 lb
- No loader model number, hydraulic detail or warranty term appears on the M Series page itself