Bobcat · Compact

Bobcat CT2025

~$20,760

MSRP, base build

Bobcat CT2025
Compact
24.5 hp engine · 22.2 PTO−9% to the shaft

Moving up to the 2000 platform more than doubles the loader rating - 1,369 lb at max height against the 1000 platform's 608 - on a 1.65 L Daedong three-cylinder that is still under 25 hp. The 9x3 manual build starts at $20,760, the three-range hydrostatic at $22,524.

Engine
24.5 hp
PTO
22.2 hp
Loader lift
1,369 lbs
3-pt lift
1,631 lbs

1.07 PTO hp per $1,000 of list price

As published by the maker

Specifications

Size class
Compact
Transmission
Gear
Engine
Daedong
Engine hp
24.5 hp
PTO hp
22.2 hp
Drive
4WD
Loader lift
1,369 lbs
Three-point lift
1,631 lbs
Hydraulic flow
11.4 GPM
Fuel tank
9 gal
Weight
2,634 lbs
4WD
Yes
Cab
Open station
Turbo
No
Cruise control
No

On the price: The maker's own published starting figure for the base build. A dealer adds a loader, a deck and freight on top.

Lift figures are the maker's and are quoted at whichever point the maker chose; the about page explains why two loaders with the same number do not lift the same pallet.

Comes with

4WDGearFront LoaderPower SteeringDiesel

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners say

What they like

  • 1,369 lb of loader lift at maximum height is more than double the 1000 platform's figure for about $3,500 more
  • 1,631 lb at 24 in behind the lift point is a genuinely heavy hitch rating for a 24.5 hp tractor
  • Still under 25 hp, so no diesel particulate filter and no regeneration cycle to plan work around
  • 11.4 gpm combined flow - 6.9 implement plus 4.5 steering - leaves headroom for a third-function attachment
  • The 9x3 manual is the cheaper of the two builds and keeps the transmission simple to service
  • 9 gal of fuel under a 2,634 lb machine makes it behave much more like a compact than a sub-compact

What they complain about

  • The 9x3 manual has no shuttle, so every direction change during loader work goes through the clutch
  • The hydrostatic build costs $1,764 more, and that is before a loader is added to either one
  • No cab is offered at this horsepower - open station only
  • Choosing hydrostatic drops PTO output to 21.8 hp, so the transmission decision costs implement power
  • Neither a warranty term nor a loader model name appears on the model page

Gathered from owner reports

What owners report

Owners know exactly what they bought: a Kioti CK2610 in white paint, usually for about $2,000 less than the Kioti it is based on. That is said matter-of-factly rather than as a complaint, and it shapes how people shop it — one buyer's three quotes for a 25 hp tractor with loader and third function came back at $27,650 for a Kubota L2502, $27,100 for a Kioti CK2620 and $26,000 for the Bobcat. Leftover stock goes much lower, with owners reporting $14,500 cash for a new one with a loader and $15,900 for a 4WD hydrostatic with loader on run-out model years, and 0% terms over 72 or 84 months are the standard structure. What people do with it is not small: a three-year owner's list runs from plowing a quarter mile of driveway and spreading 100 tons of gravel to pulling a stuck Deere 35G mini excavator out and disposing of an entire dilapidated mobile home in pieces.

The loader is where the argument is. Bobcat publishes its lift at maximum height, and one owner who moved from a CT2025 to a Yanmar with the same rated capacity insists the Yanmar out-lifts it — he buys 1,500 lb bulk feed bags, and the Bobcat could only get one a few inches off the ground hanging bare off the quick-attach bar with the backhoe extended as ballast, while the Yanmar picks the same bag off a pallet in a truck bed. Another owner with a backhoe on the back says his lifts 1,600 lb without complaint and only the curl feels underwhelming. What both agree on is that the curl is the weak link, and two owners have bent the curl cylinders — one after backing up with the bucket fully curled down and a grapple hooked on a wire fence he had not seen, then straightening them in a press rather than paying for replacements. A third owner warns against raising the hydraulic pressure for exactly that reason.

Ballast is the other thing owners mention changing the machine. One reports living in four-wheel drive before he filled the rear tires and simply driving afterwards. Reliability reports at real hours are good and the failures are small: an o-ring on the fuel filter water separator at 200 hours that no generic part would fit, ROPS blinkers broken twice on low branches, a sticking brake pedal, and one machine that takes a minute of cranking to start in a garage that never drops below freezing. The thread running through nearly every positive account is the dealer rather than the tractor — owners describe getting pickup and redelivery written into the deal, a dealer trailering the tractor to an elderly relative's house to clear snow at no charge, and Bobcat's own parts site pulling up any part by VIN and delivering in under a week.

What comes up favourably

  • It is a rebadged Kioti CK2610 and typically undercuts the Kioti by around $2,000, which is how one buyer's quotes came out at $26,000 against $27,100 for the Kioti and $27,650 for a Kubota L2502
  • Run-out stock gets genuinely cheap — owners report $14,500 cash for a new one with a loader and $15,900 for a 4WD hydrostatic with loader, alongside 0% terms over 72 to 84 months
  • It holds up to being worked hard: a three-year owner lists plowing a quarter mile of drive, spreading 100 tons of gravel, opening a mile of trails, pulling out a stuck mini excavator and demolishing a mobile home, and owners at 200, 300, 350 and 550 hours all report being happy
  • Filling the rear tires transforms it — one owner says he lived in four-wheel drive before ballasting and simply drives it afterwards
  • Parts support is a repeated bright spot: owners look parts up by VIN on Bobcat's own site, get schematics for everything, and report delivery inside a week even a long way from a dealership
  • Owners are comfortable using the loader hard, with one describing ramming the bucket into a dirt pile and lifting the rear of the tractor to get a full scoop without worrying about damage

What comes up as a complaint

  • Two owners have bent the loader's curl cylinders, and a third warns against turning the hydraulic pressure up because the cylinders feel flexible in a bad way — the shared advice is never to drive forward or back with the bucket fully curled down
  • Owners dispute whether the loader lifts what the number says: one who moved to a Yanmar with the same rating could barely get a 1,500 lb feed bag off the ground hanging bare off the quick-attach bar, while another with a backhoe for ballast reports 1,600 lb without trouble
  • The curl is the weakest hydraulic function even for owners happy with the lift, and one who has run an excavator wants the loader controls to be far more precise than they are
  • One 2024 machine kept in a garage that never freezes takes upwards of a minute of cranking to start in cold weather, and the dealer's only answer so far has been to test the batteries
  • Small parts can be dealer-only: an o-ring on the fuel filter water separator failed at 200 hours and no generic o-ring would fit it
  • The ROPS-mounted indicators sit where low branches catch them, with one owner breaking his twice before giving up and leaving them off
  • One owner reports the loader support brackets bolting partly into the cast-iron clutch housing and shearing bolts even at the correct torque, and says he could not get a straight answer out of Bobcat above dealer level

Questions worth asking

Is it really just a Kioti with different paint?
Essentially yes, and owners say so without much drama — it is built on the Kioti CK2610, with one owner noting the loader is the part that differs. The practical consequences are good ones: the machine has a known mechanical track record, a Kioti dealer can usually help with parts, and the Bobcat badge typically costs about $2,000 less than the Kioti equivalent. Owners who cross-shopped both mostly chose on which dealer they preferred.
Will it lift what the spec sheet says?
Read the measuring point carefully — the figure is taken at maximum height, and at least one owner argues that makes Bobcat's number look better than machines quoting lift at the pin. His practical test was a 1,500 lb feed bag, which his CT2025 could barely raise a few inches even with a backhoe as counterweight, while a Yanmar with the same published rating handled it easily. Other owners report 1,600 lb without complaint. The safe planning assumption is that ballast decides the outcome as much as the loader does.
What breaks on a CT2025?
Not much, and what does is small. The one real pattern is bent curl cylinders, which owners trace to driving with the bucket fully curled down and catching something. Beyond that: an o-ring on the fuel filter water separator at 200 hours, ROPS indicator lights snapped off by branches, a brake pedal that sticks, and an o-ring pinched during dealer installation of the rear remotes. Owners at 300 to 550 hours report nothing that stopped the machine working for long.
Does the Bobcat dealer network make up for the badge?
For the owners in this evidence it is the whole reason they are happy. Examples they give are concrete: pickup and redelivery for scheduled service and warranty work written into the purchase agreement, a dealer trailering a tractor 25 miles free of charge so an elderly relative's drive could be cleared in an emergency, and a dealer brokering the private sale of a trade-in. The dissenting voice is an owner who escalated a structural concern past his dealer and could not get Bobcat itself to engage.
Is it enough tractor, or should I go to a CT2040?
It depends almost entirely on the rear PTO rather than the loader. Owners doing loader work, gravel, snow and general property maintenance on a handful of acres are content. The ones who upgraded did so because they wanted to run large three-point attachments — flail mowers, woodchippers, wide rotary cutters — which is where 25 hp runs out first. One buyer weighing the two put it well: the 2025 will do everything on his list, and the 2040 would simply never reach its limits.

Summarised from public owner discussion, not from testing. Nothing here was measured by this site, and a report that recurs is not the same as a defect rate.

Cross-shopped against

Line the Bobcat CT2025 up

Same brand or same size, nearest in price

Related tractors

More from Bobcat →
Bobcat CT2035
~$28,653MSRP, base build
Compact

Bobcat

Bobcat CT2035

34.9 hp engine · 29.4 PTO−16% to the shaft
Loader
1,389 lbs
3-pt
1,631 lbs
Trans
Hydrostatic
Drive
4WD

A 34.9 hp Daedong three-cylinder dropped into the same 2000-platform chassis as the CT2025, which means ten more engine horsepower and almost no change in what the loader or hitch can lift. $28,653 in open station; the CT2535 adds a heated, air-conditioned cab at $41,173.

Spec sheet & owner notes
Bobcat CT2040
~$29,415MSRP, base build
Compact

Bobcat

Bobcat CT2040

39.6 hp engine · 31.9 PTO−19% to the shaft
Loader
1,389 lbs
3-pt
1,631 lbs
Trans
Hydrostatic
Drive
4WD

At 39.6 hp it tops the 2000 platform for only $762 more than the 34.9 hp CT2035 beneath it - the cheapest way to nearly 40 hp that Bobcat publishes. Every loader, hitch and hydraulic figure is shared with the smaller models in the platform.

Spec sheet & owner notes
Bobcat CT4050
~$32,608MSRP, base build
Compact

Bobcat

Bobcat CT4050

50.3 hp engine · 45.6 PTO−9% to the shaft
Loader
1,795 lbs
3-pt
2,716 lbs
Trans
Shuttle
Drive
4WD

50.3 hp and 45.6 PTO hp for a published $32,608 - less than the 44.9 hp CT4045 costs, because this one is sold with the 8x8 synchro shuttle as its base build rather than a hydrostatic. It is the most PTO power per dollar Bobcat lists.

Spec sheet & owner notes