Kubota · Utility

Kubota M7060

~$44,781

MSRP, base build

Kubota M7060
Utility
72.1 hp engine · 62 PTO−14% to the shaft

Same 72.1 hp V3307 as the M4-071 in a plainer, lighter and $16,943 cheaper package. The 12-speed HD12 build adds a limited-slip front differential, electro-hydraulic 4WD and a 16.2 gpm pump for the price of 2 PTO hp.

Engine
72.1 hp
PTO
62 hp
Loader lift
2,469 lbs
3-pt lift
3,307 lbs

1.38 PTO hp per $1,000 of list price

As published by the maker

Specifications

Size class
Utility
Transmission
Power Shuttle
Engine
Kubota
Engine hp
72.1 hp
PTO hp
62 hp
Drive
4WD
Loader lift
2,469 lbs
Three-point lift
3,307 lbs
Hydraulic flow
11.0 GPM
Fuel tank
18.5 gal
Weight
5,027 lbs
Warranty
3 yr / 3000 hr powertrain
4WD
Yes
Cab
Available
Turbo
Yes
Cruise control
No

On the price: The maker's own published starting figure for the base build. A dealer adds a loader, a deck and freight on top.

Lift figures are the maker's and are quoted at whichever point the maker chose; the about page explains why two loaders with the same number do not lift the same pallet.

Comes with

4WDCabDieselFront LoaderPower ShuttlePower SteeringTurbo

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners say

What they like

  • 62 PTO hp - two more than the M4-071 makes from the identical engine, because the M60 drivetrain takes less out of it
  • $44,781 against $61,724 for an M4-071 with the same V3307 block and the same LA1154 loader
  • The optional F12/R12 build brings a 16.2 gpm pump, electro-hydraulic 4WD and standard 540/540E
  • 5,027 lb in 4WD ROPS trim is nearly a thousand pounds lighter than an M4, which matters on wet ground
  • Cab, ROPS, 2WD and 4WD are all offered, so the same model covers a wide spread of jobs and budgets

What they complain about

  • 62 PTO hp applies to the 8-speed builds; ordering the 12-speed drops it to 60
  • The base 8-speed's 11.0 gpm is well short of the 16.7 gpm an M4 pushes to the hitch
  • Semi-flat deck and an older operator station - the M60 platform predates the M4 and Grand L70 cabs by years
  • Kubota's M-series powertrain cover is 36 months or 3,000 hours, against 72 months on the smaller L and MX tractors

Gathered from owner reports

What owners report

Owners treat this as the point where a tractor stops being a compact and becomes a farm machine, and they are explicit about the distinction. One buyer who was about to sign for an MX6000 walked away because he wanted utility-tractor features instead, and says he is glad he did. The implement list owners report running is the evidence: 8-foot brush hogs, a 15-foot batwing, 8-foot mounted disc mowers, round and square balers, rakes, 7-foot box blades and offset flail mowers. One owner tilling unworked clay says it barely comes off idle and the engine speed does not even fluctuate, where the old Ford he used to do it with worked hard in low first. Turning radius comes up repeatedly as exceptional for the size, which is what lets a 70-horsepower tractor still serve as the chore machine around buildings.

Two things dominate the buying advice. The first is the transmission: owners who bought the 8-speed say, over and over and independently, that they would order the 12-speed next time. They describe the 8-speed as having some gears too slow and others too fast, and point at ground engagement and hay work as where the gaps hurt. The small PTO horsepower penalty the 12-speed carries does not feature in their reasoning at all. The second is the comparison with the M6060 beneath it: a Kubota salesman says dealer cost between the two differs by only two or three thousand dollars and that he never recommends the M6060 for that reason, and owners who liked their M6060 nonetheless name an M7060 with 12 speeds as their next machine.

Emissions hardware is where the record genuinely divides, and it is worth reading carefully because the loudest account is one owner rather than many. That owner, describing the same machine across several discussions, reports a diesel particulate filter that refused to regenerate while working, threw engine codes, and demanded parked regeneration cycles that held the tractor still at high revs for twenty minutes to an hour, along with dealer visits inside the first six months. Another owner flatly contradicts it, saying his regenerates while he keeps working, and credits holding the engine near 2,000 rpm and not shutting it down while hot. Set against that, the reliability reports are quiet and consistent: examples at around 600 hours from new described as trouble-free, and a longer-term owner who says all he has done is fluids and repainting the loader bucket. The weak points owners name are the seat, which someone who has run Deeres rates below them, and cab air filters that are a nuisance to clean on dusty daily work.

What comes up favourably

  • The 12-speed build is what owners tell each other to buy, and the advice comes from several people independently - owners of 8-speed machines describe some gears as too slow and others too fast, and name ground engagement and hay work as where the 12-speed pays for itself.
  • Turning radius is repeatedly singled out as exceptional against other 70-horsepower utility tractors, which is what keeps it usable as the everyday chore machine rather than only a field tractor.
  • It lifts roughly a ton to about pickup-bed height, and owners use it as a stand-in for a forklift in places a forklift cannot reach - one says that capability alone decided the purchase over anything smaller.
  • Trouble reports are sparse. Machines at around 600 hours from new get described as having needed nothing beyond fluid and filter service, and a longer-term owner reports only fluid maintenance plus repainting the loader bucket.
  • It carries full-size implements without drama - owners report 15-foot batwings, 8-foot disc mowers, round balers, square balers and 7-foot box blades all working well, and one tilling raw clay says the engine does not even change note.
  • The design has been in production a long time and sold worldwide, and one owner notes it stayed in the range through an emissions rule change that saw Kubota replace its larger tractors, which is part of why parts and dealer familiarity are reported as easy.
  • Resale is strong enough to shape how people buy: one owner who paid $48K with a loader five years earlier was offered $35K in trade at 250 hours, and used listings sit close enough to new that one buyer paid new-machine money for a 400-hour older equivalent rather than compromise on specification.
  • Kubota's financing is called out as a genuine advantage rather than a footnote, with one owner reporting seven years at 1.99%.

What comes up as a complaint

  • The emissions system is the sharpest complaint on record and owners disagree about it. One owner describes the filter refusing to regenerate under load, throwing codes, and forcing parked regeneration cycles that hold the machine at high revs for twenty minutes to an hour, plus warranty visits in the first six months. Another says his regenerates while he keeps working.
  • It is light for its horsepower. Owners who otherwise rate it highly still call it a touch light, and describe it as handling round bales rather than shrugging at them; the standard answer is fluid in the rear tires, with one owner filling them three-quarters.
  • The loader will pick the back wheels up. One owner maxed it out trying to flip a downed tree, lifted the rear end four feet clear of the ground, and switched to pushing the tree instead.
  • The operator station is where it loses to Deere. An owner who has run both rates the seat as not particularly comfortable by comparison and says the cab air filters are a nuisance on work that needs them cleaned daily - though another owner in the same discussion rates the Kubota cab better laid out if less roomy, and prefers its open-station version outright.
  • Wide ground-driven implements can outmatch it. One owner found a 10-foot shredder bogging it down where a 55-horsepower Deere did not notice the implement was there, and traded it for a bigger machine.
  • Kubota's connected-equipment software draws an explicitly poor review from someone who works on these, who advises avoiding the telematics and warns that a dealer without good service-information contacts will struggle with diagnosis.
  • It is vulnerable to sitting between seasons: one owner had mice destroy the wiring harness, a repair quoted in the thousands that his equipment policy covered for a $250 deductible.

Questions worth asking

Should I order the 8-speed or the 12-speed?
Owners are close to unanimous on the 12-speed, and several who bought the 8-speed say plainly that they would choose differently next time. They describe the 8-speed's spacing as leaving some gears too slow and others too fast, and point at ground engagement and putting up hay as where that bites. Nobody raises the small PTO horsepower difference as a reason to go the other way. While specifying it, owners also suggest ordering three rear remotes rather than the single one a base machine can arrive with.
Is the M7060 worth the step up from the M6060?
A Kubota salesman answering this says dealer cost between the two differs by only two or three thousand dollars, and that he never recommends the M6060 as a result. Owners who had an M6060 and genuinely liked it still nominate an M7060 with the 12-speed as their next machine, citing the extra power and the transmission rather than any fault with the smaller tractor. Physically they are described as the same size.
How many hours is too many on a used one?
Buyers treat this as a utility tractor rather than a compact, and expect it to see 500 or more hours a year in daily farm use, so 1,500 hours on a well-cared-for example is considered reasonable rather than worrying. What does catch people out is price: used examples sit close to new money, and one owner was offered $35K in trade for a five-year-old machine with 250 hours that had cost $48K with the loader.
Will the diesel particulate filter give me trouble?
The record splits, and it is worth knowing that the worst account comes from one owner rather than many. He reports it refusing to regenerate while working, throwing engine codes, and requiring parked cycles that tie the tractor up at high revs for twenty minutes to an hour. Another owner reports regenerating while he continues to work, and credits keeping the engine near 2,000 rpm and not shutting it down hot. Ask the dealer how regeneration is handled on the specific machine rather than assuming either outcome.
How does it compare with a John Deere 5075E?
Owners who have run both call the Deere simpler and the Kubota better geared - the 12F/12R box rated as fine, where an older 5075E's 9F/3R needed a complete stop to change range and had a stiff four-wheel-drive engagement lever. The Deere cab is described as more spacious and the Kubota's as better laid out. One owner also notes the 5075E is built in India, which some buyers weigh and others do not.
Is it stable working across slopes?
One owner in West Virginia runs his up, down and across hills he reckons would shock most people, and credits fluid-filled rear tires plus a mounted rear implement for keeping it planted. Read that as one experienced operator's comfort level on ground he knows well rather than a rating for the tractor. The general practice owners describe is pairing loader work with ballast or a three-point implement before working sideways on a hill at all.

Summarised from public owner discussion, not from testing. Nothing here was measured by this site, and a report that recurs is not the same as a defect rate.

Cross-shopped against

Line the Kubota M7060 up

Same brand or same size, nearest in price

Related tractors

More from Kubota →
Kubota L5070
~$46,253MSRP, base build
Utility

Kubota

Kubota L5070

50 hp engine · 39.8 PTO−20% to the shaft
Loader
2,427 lbs
3-pt
2,756 lbs
Trans
Hydrostatic
Drive
4WD

Where the Grand L70 changes loaders: the LA1056 replaces the LA806 and pivot-pin lift jumps from 1,726 to 2,427 lb. The 50 hp V2403-CR-TE5 is the same block as the L4470 below it, turned up and given a longer frame.

Spec sheet & owner notes
Kubota M6060
~$43,018MSRP, base build
UtilitySeries photo

Kubota

Kubota M6060

66.4 hp engine · 56 PTO−16% to the shaft
Loader
2,469 lbs
3-pt
3,307 lbs
Trans
Power Shuttle
Drive
4WD · cab

Middle of the M60 range and the point where the series stops being a stripped machine: the 203 cu in V3307 replaces the M5660's 148.5 cu in V2403, and a factory cab, tilt steering and an electronic panel all become available.

Spec sheet & owner notes
Kubota MX6000
~$41,020MSRP, base build
UtilitySeries photo

Kubota

Kubota MX6000

63.4 hp engine · 51.8 PTO−18% to the shaft
Loader
2,275 lbs
3-pt
2,310 lbs
Trans
Hydrostatic
Drive
4WD

Hydrostatic only - Kubota offers no gear box on the biggest MX. The 63.4 hp tune of the V2403-CR-T sends 51.8 hp to the PTO, ten more than the MX4900, on a chassis that weighs just 18 lb more.

Spec sheet & owner notes