Kubota · Utility

Kubota MX6000

~$41,020

MSRP, base build

Kubota MX6000
Maker's photo for this series, not this exact model — trim, wheels and cab may differ
Utility
63.4 hp engine · 51.8 PTO−18% to the shaft

Hydrostatic only - Kubota offers no gear box on the biggest MX. The 63.4 hp tune of the V2403-CR-T sends 51.8 hp to the PTO, ten more than the MX4900, on a chassis that weighs just 18 lb more.

Engine
63.4 hp
PTO
51.8 hp
Loader lift
2,275 lbs
3-pt lift
2,310 lbs

1.26 PTO hp per $1,000 of list price

As published by the maker

Specifications

Size class
Utility
Transmission
Hydrostatic
Engine
Kubota
Engine hp
63.4 hp
PTO hp
51.8 hp
Drive
4WD
Loader lift
2,275 lbs
Three-point lift
2,310 lbs
Hydraulic flow
9.5 GPM
Fuel tank
13.5 gal
Weight
3,734 lbs
Warranty
6 yr / 3000 hr powertrain
4WD
Yes
Cab
Open station
Turbo
Yes
Cruise control
No

On the price: The maker's own published starting figure for the base build. A dealer adds a loader, a deck and freight on top.

Lift figures are the maker's and are quoted at whichever point the maker chose; the about page explains why two loaders with the same number do not lift the same pallet.

Comes with

4WDHydrostaticFront LoaderPower SteeringTurboDiesel

From owner discussion and long-term write-ups

What owners say

What they like

  • 51.8 PTO hp is more than a 55.5 hp MX5400 makes and enough for a seven-foot cutter or a mid-size baler
  • Three-range hydrostatic with pedal control suits loader cycles and headland turns better than the MX4900's partially synchronized 8-speed
  • Shares the MX5400's 3,734 lb ROPS weight, so it delivers 13 more horsepower without a heavier machine to get stuck
  • Category I and II three-point hitch, plus up to three rear remotes, on a chassis that still fits a 70 in wide gate
  • The LA1065 loader is the same unit fitted to the cheaper MX models, so attachments and buckets carry across the series

What they complain about

  • The loader and hitch figures do not change at all over an MX5400, so the step up buys engine and PTO horsepower and nothing else — and Kubota's published starting figures across the MX range are not like-for-like configurations, so compare a dealer quote for the build you actually want rather than the list gap
  • No gear option at any price, so anyone who wants a clutch and a shuttle has to drop to the MX5400
  • Hydrostatic drive costs power in transfer - 51.8 PTO hp from 63.4 engine hp is a bigger loss than the gear MX4900 gives up
  • Fuel capacity falls from 13.5 to 11.9 gal with the cab, on the model most likely to be ordered with one
  • Loader lift of 2,275 lb at the pivot pin is well under the 2,848 lb an L47 manages, despite this being a larger tractor

Gathered from owner reports

What owners report

The question owners actually argue about is not whether this is a good tractor but why you would buy it instead of the MX5400 parked next to it. People who have been through that decision describe the two as one machine in two engine tunes on a shared frame, and report the real price gap between them at something like $1,500 to $2,000 rather than anything dramatic. What settles it for most is implement paperwork: owners running a three-point stump grinder or planning a PTO snowblower point out that an implement calling for 50 PTO hp puts the smaller tune in warranty grey area, while this one clears the bar. A Kubota technician who works on them says they very seldom come in for major failures, and a 2020 cab example used hard for manure spreading, snow, brush hogging and stationary PTO work is described by its owner as having broken nothing that was not his own fault.

Ballast is the recurring theme, and it is not optional. Several owners describe the machine picking its own rear wheels off the ground at maximum loader lift before the loader itself runs out. The fix is staged rather than single: loaded rear tires help but are not enough, and one owner went on to a ballast box with 800 to 900 lb of concrete before he could finally reach the loader's relief. Even fully ballasted, owners carrying real weight - one describes 1,500 to 1,800 lb of split firewood on pallet forks with filled tires and an 800 lb implement behind - still call it tippy if you turn or travel too fast. Loader capacity, not engine power, is the ceiling owners report hitting in daily work: one farm using a cab model across manure, snow and brush is now thinking about a skid steer for the heavy end. From the other direction, owners of the L4802 and L4060 say they wish they had bought this instead, citing loader capacity and hydraulics specifically.

Drive choice and cab quality are where opinion divides. Owners doing loader work are emphatic that hydrostatic is the right pick and would not run a gear box near anything they care about damaging, and they report it still pulling an eight-foot rotary cutter without complaint. Owners doing long tillage days say a gear machine suits that better, and one shopper who started on a cab MX6000 ended up on a used M60-series gear tractor instead because he wanted more ground-engagement gears. In high range owners report running short of grunt rather than traction - a manure spreader can be stalled from full throttle, and snow work runs out of power in the middle range - while in low it is traction that gives up first. The cab is widely called worth the money for heat, air conditioning and pollen season, but owners who have sat in a Grand L cab describe this one as basic, and it arrives without side mirrors, an armrest or a radio head unit.

What comes up favourably

  • The step up from the MX5400 is small money for a real capability change. Owners who priced both report them within roughly $1,500 to $2,000 of each other and describe them as the same machine tuned differently, so the bigger tune clears implements that specify 50 PTO hp where the smaller one leaves you arguing about warranty.
  • A Kubota technician who services them says they rarely see one for a major failure, and owners bear that out - a 2020 cab example worked hard on a farm and dealer-serviced annually is described as having broken nothing that was not the owner's own doing.
  • Hydrostatic is the reason most buyers chose this model over the M-series and they do not regret it. Owners who have run gear, shuttle and hydrostatic tractors say hydrostatic is the one to have for loader work close to buildings and trees, and report it still handling an eight-foot rotary cutter.
  • It is the tractor owners of the next size down wish they had bought. L4802 and L4060 owners both point at loader capacity, with the L4060 owner adding that he keeps spending money upgrading hydraulics instead of having bought more tractor up front.
  • Buying from a distant dealer costs you little. Several owners bought two or three hours from home after a local quote came in higher - one by about $1,500 - and report warranty work is manufacturer-paid so the nearby dealer still services the machine happily.
  • Resale holds up and the used supply is thin. Owners report it being genuinely hard to find secondhand, which makes one easy to sell, and the view passed around is to price a four- or five-year-old example off current list rather than discounting it like a car.
  • Owners find routine service straightforward to do themselves, with the 100-hour service in particular reported as simple and the filter and fluid work manageable without the dealer.

What comes up as a complaint

  • It will lift its own back end. Owners describe the rear wheels leaving the ground at maximum loader capacity with nothing on the hitch, and loaded rear tires only partly fix it - one owner needed a ballast box with 800 to 900 lb of concrete before he could reach the loader's relief, and still calls heavy loads unbalanced.
  • Loader capacity is the limit owners actually run into rather than power. A farm running one across manure, snow and brush reports feeling limited there and is weighing a skid steer, and owners warn that a six-foot grapple consumes a large share of the rating before you have picked anything up.
  • High range runs out of power before it runs out of traction. One owner cannot use high pulling a manure spreader and can stall the engine from full throttle, and finds snow work running short in the middle range; in low, by contrast, traction gives up first.
  • Curling the bucket and raising the loader at the same time noticeably loads the hydraulics. One owner describes it as a machine you do one thing at a time with, and says he is unsure whether that is by design.
  • The cab is functional rather than pleasant. Owners who have used a Grand L cab call this one basic, it comes without side mirrors, armrest or radio head unit, and owners working in trees report peeling the signal lights off repeatedly.
  • Kubota's own KTAC coverage is quoted at roughly double what owners' regular insurers charge. Figures reported land around $86 to $90 a month against about $40 from an outside carrier, with one owner finding a third of the price and half the deductible through his own insurer.
  • Owners looking at row-crop or sustained field work are not confident it is enough machine, and the advice that comes back tends to point at an M7060 or an M4D rather than reassure them.
  • One buyer working through the online configurator found no third-function option listed at all and had to arrange the grapple circuit through the dealer instead, which is worth sorting before delivery rather than after.

Questions worth asking

Is the MX6000 worth the extra money over the MX5400?
Owners describe them as one machine with two engine tunes on the same frame, and report the real gap at $1,500 to $2,000 rather than anything large. The consensus is yes if you are earning with the tractor or plan to run an implement that specifies 50 PTO hp, because the bigger tune clears that and the smaller leaves you in warranty grey area. If the work is mowing and you do not mind it taking slightly longer, owners say the 5400 is genuinely fine.
How much rear ballast does it actually need?
More than most buyers expect, and loaded rear tires alone are not it. Owners report the rear wheels coming off the ground at maximum lift with nothing on the hitch, loaded tires improving it only somewhat, and a ballast box with roughly 800 to 900 lb of concrete being the point where several stopped feeling nervous. Even then, heavy loads are described as tippy if you turn or travel too quickly.
Will it start in deep cold?
Owners split on this. One reports his firing at -25C with the block heater unplugged after years of hard use, while another in northern Wisconsin at -20F describes very slow cranking even on a battery maintainer and with jumper cables attached, and suspects the factory battery. If the machine lives outdoors in that kind of winter, plan on the block heater and a strong battery rather than assuming it will cope.
Is the cab worth paying for?
Owners who bought one say yes, and point specifically at mowing and snow plowing as the jobs that justify it, along with heat, air conditioning and pollen season. The caveats are that owners used to a Grand L cab find this one basic, that it is awkward around trees - signal lights get torn off - and that mirrors, armrest and radio head unit are not included in the price.
Can I buy it from a dealer hours away?
Owners do this routinely and report no regrets. Warranty work is paid by the manufacturer, so a nearby dealer will still service the machine, and several used a written quote from two or three hours out to bring the local price down first. One owner notes his original dealer sold the franchise a year after the sale, which is an argument against paying a premium for the relationship alone.
Should I take Kubota's KTAC insurance with it?
Possibly not at the price quoted. Owners consistently find their own carriers cheaper, reporting roughly $40 a month against $86 to $90 for KTAC, and at least one found a third of the price with half the deductible elsewhere. Owners do still recommend insuring it somehow, because the damage a loader tractor takes is exactly what such a policy covers.

Summarised from public owner discussion, not from testing. Nothing here was measured by this site, and a report that recurs is not the same as a defect rate.

Cross-shopped against

Line the Kubota MX6000 up

Same brand or same size, nearest in price

Related tractors

More from Kubota →
Kubota M6060
~$43,018MSRP, base build
UtilitySeries photo

Kubota

Kubota M6060

66.4 hp engine · 56 PTO−16% to the shaft
Loader
2,469 lbs
3-pt
3,307 lbs
Trans
Power Shuttle
Drive
4WD · cab

Middle of the M60 range and the point where the series stops being a stripped machine: the 203 cu in V3307 replaces the M5660's 148.5 cu in V2403, and a factory cab, tilt steering and an electronic panel all become available.

Spec sheet & owner notes
Kubota M7060
~$44,781MSRP, base build
Utility

Kubota

Kubota M7060

72.1 hp engine · 62 PTO−14% to the shaft
Loader
2,469 lbs
3-pt
3,307 lbs
Trans
Power Shuttle
Drive
4WD · cab

Same 72.1 hp V3307 as the M4-071 in a plainer, lighter and $16,943 cheaper package. The 12-speed HD12 build adds a limited-slip front differential, electro-hydraulic 4WD and a 16.2 gpm pump for the price of 2 PTO hp.

Spec sheet & owner notes
Kubota L5070
~$46,253MSRP, base build
Utility

Kubota

Kubota L5070

50 hp engine · 39.8 PTO−20% to the shaft
Loader
2,427 lbs
3-pt
2,756 lbs
Trans
Hydrostatic
Drive
4WD

Where the Grand L70 changes loaders: the LA1056 replaces the LA806 and pivot-pin lift jumps from 1,726 to 2,427 lb. The 50 hp V2403-CR-TE5 is the same block as the L4470 below it, turned up and given a longer frame.

Spec sheet & owner notes